Free Philip Vance!


I was recently denied the evidentiary hearing I was optimistic about receiving. However, I remain optimistic that a judge will eventually see the full picture. My constitutional rights were clearly violated.
The Conviction Review Unit (CRU) recently participated in the review and exoneration of Edgar Barrientos-Quintana, who served 16 years after being wrongfully convicted. The so-called “neutral” unit of the Attorney General’s Office found many issues in the initial investigation that led to his wrongful conviction.
Please review why the CRU found that Mr. Barrientos-Quintana’s wrongful conviction was influenced by flaws in his investigation—and not mine. I am sharing new details of my case with the public.
This is how I was wrongfully convicted.
Philip Vance, April 2026
Philip Vance is innocent and his legal team has the proof!
The basic facts are in this short one minute slide show.The details of his wrongful conviction and the progress toward his complete exoneration are below.
On December 22, 2002, Khalid Al-Bakkri, a store clerk at Sabreen’s in South St. Paul, was murdered. I became a suspect that same night.
Colleen McManus contacted her brother, John McManus of the Metro Gang Strike Force (MGSF), regarding comments a bar patron allegedly made. Investigators from South St. Paul and the MGSF immediately locked into a theory too early and followed me for nearly a month. Instead of investigating my alibi at the outset, officers executed two undercover wire stings using Melissa Stites.
First sting: Stites purchased a gun from me. This firearm was later determined not to be the murder weapon.
Second sting: Intended to elicit incriminating statements connecting me to the murder. The recording was inaudible, and the conversation could not be captured (or so they claim).
One week later, I was arrested by John McManus. This led to a week-long stay in Ramsey County Jail.
Charges were eventually dropped, but the arrest appeared orchestrated to create a third interaction with Stites after the failed second sting. During this time:
This same day, January 23, 2003, I was approached and questioned for the first time by investigators—a full month after the murder. I was transferred to the Dakota County Justice Center.
I agreed to answer their questions without a lawyer because I didn’t have anything to hide.
During a 6+ hour interrogation:
After hours of pressure, I stated: A month had passed, I had been intoxicated that night, I did not remember saying anything.
Investigators focused heavily on Colleen McManus. They insisted I would not be a suspect unless I admitted telling someone I shot a person.
Under exhaustion and pressure:
At trial, Detective Kreager testified that he used the Reid Technique—a method known for producing false confessions and banned in other countries.
I have consistently denied any involvement in or knowledge of the Sabreen’s murder.
During the same interrogation, investigators demanded a detailed account of my whereabouts at the time of the murder.
The truth:
Investigators refused to accept that I simply could not recall events from a month prior.
When I was confident about my alibi after seeing a football schedule, officers attempted to verify it.
Darlene Walton could not clearly recall that night due to the time lapse. Investigators told me my alibi did not check out. As a result, my trial counsel did not call Darlene —or any witnesses—on my behalf.
Additionally, Detective Kreager claimed my location could be confirmed through cell site data, but this evidence was never produced.
After the interrogation, I was released.
Three months later, I was federally indicted for gun possession (related to the firearm sold to Stites).
Ten months later, I was formally charged with the murder of Khalid Al-Bakkri.
Colleen McManus
KJ
Melissa Stites (CRI)
Metro Gang Strike Force (MGSF) Officers:
Jailhouse Informants (JI)
Witnesses who later recanted
Failure to investigate my alibi promptly. A one-month delay that resulted in:
Reliance on
Lack of Evidence
Prosecutor Kathy Keena emphasized witness testimony over lack of evidence.
My defense:
I was wrongfully convicted because I was not given a fair opportunity to establish my alibi when it mattered most – the day I became a suspect. Instead, investigators spent a month building a case against me.
I have now served 22 years in prison for a crime I did not commit.
I was railroaded. Investigators had tunnel vision.
This investigation was flawed from the beginning.
Who will take responsibility for the injustice I endure and survive every day?
Philip Vance
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.